How Putin''s autocracy undercut Russia''s economy and chances for democracy
During his nearly twenty years at the center of Russian political power, Vladimir Putin has transformed the vast country in many ways, not all of them for the better. The near-chaos of the early post-Soviet years has been replaced by an increasingly rigid authoritarianism, resembling a hard-fisted monarchy more than the previous communist dictatorship. Putin''s early years in power saw rapid economic growth, averaging nearly 7 percent annually, and the rise of Moscow as a vibrant European-style city. But a slowdown during the second half of Putin''s administration, since 2009, has resulted in the stagnation of the economy, especially in the hinterlands, with few signs of a possible turnaround.
What accounted for these changes in Russia? Sergey Aleksashenko, a former top Russian finance official and then private businessman, lays the blame squarely on Putin himself, even more than external factors such as the sharp fall in oil prices or Western sanctions after Russia''s annexation of Crimea in 2014.
In his relentless drive to consolidate power in his own hands, Aleksashenko writes, Putin has destroyed the very idea of competition for political power. He has done so by systematically undercutting basic political institutions of the post-Soviet Russian state, including independent power centers such as the parliament, the judiciary, and a free media. In the economic realm, Putin effectively undermined Russia''s still-emerging and very fragile system for protecting property rights—the basis of all economic activity. This in turn caused a sharp decline in private investment and thus contributed to the long-term economic slowdown.
One result of Putin''s rule was the destruction of the emerging checks and balances system in Russia, and that would be a major problem for Russia if and when it decides to become a "normal" democratic country based on Western values. In describing how all this happened, Aleksashenko''s book offers universal lessons in the necessity of checks and balances in any political system—as well as in the importance of vibrant political institutions for economic growth.
How Putin''s autocracy undercut Russia''s economy and chances for democracy
During his nearly twenty years at the center of Russian political power, Vladimir Putin has transformed the vast country in many ways, not all of them for the better. The near-chaos of the early post-Soviet years has been replaced by an increasingly rigid authoritarianism, resembling a hard-fisted monarchy more than the previous communist dictatorship. Putin''s early years in power saw rapid economic growth, averaging nearly 7 percent annually, and the rise of Moscow as a vibrant European-style city. But a slowdown during the second half of Putin''s administration, since 2009, has resulted in the stagnation of the economy, especially in the hinterlands, with few signs of a possible turnaround.
What accounted for these changes in Russia? Sergey Aleksashenko, a former top Russian finance official and then private businessman, lays the blame squarely on Putin himself, even more than external factors such as the sharp fall in oil prices or Western sanctions after Russia''s annexation of Crimea in 2014.
In his relentless drive to consolidate power in his own hands, Aleksashenko writes, Putin has destroyed the very idea of competition for political power. He has done so by systematically undercutting basic political institutions of the post-Soviet Russian state, including independent power centers such as the parliament, the judiciary, and a free media. In the economic realm, Putin effectively undermined Russia''s still-emerging and very fragile system for protecting property rights—the basis of all economic activity. This in turn caused a sharp decline in private investment and thus contributed to the long-term economic slowdown.
One result of Putin''s rule was the destruction of the emerging checks and balances system in Russia, and that would be a major problem for Russia if and when it decides to become a "normal" democratic country based on Western values. In describing how all this happened, Aleksashenko''s book offers universal lessons in the necessity of checks and balances in any political system—as well as in the importance of vibrant political institutions for economic growth.
Prisen for levering afhænger af typen af dit medlemskab, eller om du ikke har et medlemskab.
Hvis du ikke har et medlemsskab er priserne som følger:
Levering til pakkeshop | 39,95 kr. pr. ordre |
Hjemmelevering | 59,90 kr. pr. ordre |
Med et guldmedlemsskab er leveringspriserne:
Levering til pakkeshop. Ordrer under 250 kr. | 34,95 kr. pr. ordre |
Levering til pakkeshop. Ordrer over 250 kr. | 24,95 kr. pr. ordre |
Hjemmelevering. Ordrer under 250 kr. | 59,90 kr. pr. ordre |
Hjemmelevering. Ordrer over 250 kr. | 49,90 kr. pr. ordre |
Med et plating- eller streaming medlemsskab er leveringspriserne:
Levering til pakkeshop. Ordrer under 250 kr. | 24,95 kr. pr. ordre |
Levering til pakkeshop. Ordrer over 250 kr. | 0 kr. pr. ordre |
Hjemmelevering. Ordrer under 250 kr. | 44,90 kr. pr. ordre |
Hjemmelevering. Ordrer over 250 kr. | 19,95 kr. pr. ordre |
Bemærk venligst, at vi forbeholder os retten til at ændre i et fragtbeløb efter ordreafgivelse, hvis man som kunde har opnået en særlig fragtpris pga. køb for over 250 kr. og efterfølgende retter i sin ordre, så ordrebeløbet kommer under 250 kr. Ovenstående fragtpriser for ordrer under 250 kr. vil i så fald være gældende.
Levering
Varerne sendes indenfor 1-6 hverdage. Den konkrete leveringstid står oplyst ved hver enkelt vare. Levering sker med PostNord eller DAO distribution. Vi leverer kun i Danmark og ikke til Grønland og Færøerne.
Vær opmærksom på, at DAO ofte leverer om natten, og at der ikke skal kvitteres for modtagelse af pakken fra DAO. Hvis ikke DAO kan levere pakken forsvarligt ved dør eller i postkasse,
vil pakken i stedet blive leveret til nærmeste pakkeshop, også selvom du har betalt for hjemmelevering.